ANDERSON UNIVERSITY

APA LABORATORY REPORT WRITING FOR SINGLE EXPERIMENTS

(The portions of this sheet that are relevant to PSYC 2000 are in bold face.)

 

The Publications Manual (2001, on reserve in the library) of the American Psychological Association (APA) has set forth rules for report-writing that we use at AU.  Those rules are summarized here.  Citations in the text of a paper are made using the “author-copyright date” method (e.g. Jones, 1994).  The portions of this summary useful for library research papers (as distinguished from conducting an experiment and writing about it) are the “Introduction” and “Reference” sections.  All papers must be typed and double-spaced (except PSYC 2000 summary sheets, which are single-spaced).

 

Students are encouraged to consult APA journals that publish research reports to better understand how reports are written (examples of print media are: Behavioral Neuroscience, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Journal of Comparative Psychology, Journal of Counseling Psychology, Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, Journal of Educational Psychology, Journal of Family Psychology, Journal of Personality & Social Psychology).  PSYC 2000 students can also use the Journal of Social Psychology, and the Journal of Psychology, which are non-APA journals that are similar enough to APA to use.  PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE ARE MANY MORE AVAILABLE ONLINE THROUGH “EBSCO HOST” THAT YOU CAN PRINT ( go to Internet Explorer, and then go to  the following address: “bones.anderson.edu” and look under “choose index” which is located on the left).  There are also two journals that are theoretical and review in nature (i.e. they are not research reports) that are similar to our “library research” papers, and should NOT be used for PSYC 2000 summaries: Psychological Bulletin and Psychological Review.

 

PLEASE SEE PAGES 305-320 IN THE APA PUBLICATION MANUAL (2001) FOR AN EXAMPLE OF THIS APA FORMAT. This book is on reserve in the University Library.  The INTERNET has additional APA style helps (go to “http://www.google.com,” and in the search box enter “APA style.”)   Select “OWL, for example, ” (from Purdue University’s writing program) for additional help. 

 

Title Page

 

This should be your outside cover sheet.  In the middle of the page, center the name of your experiment.  Page numbers go in the upper right corner and begin on the title page.  Five spaces to the left of the page number should have your “manuscript page header,” which is the first two or three words of your title (it appears on each page, not just the title page).  Also, in the upper left corner of the title page only, type “Running Head:” followed by an abbreviated title in capital letters (50 characters or fewer, counting letters, spaces, etc.).  The running head should be down one line so it doesn’t run into the page header.

 

On separate lines below the name of the experiment, center your name and Anderson University.  For AU students, include the date you handed in the paper in the lower right hand corner.

 

Abstract

 

This should be the second page (i.e. follows the Title Page) of your completed report, and the paragraph is NOT indented.  It is a brief (limited to 960 characters, including spaces, about 120 words) summary of the salient points drawn from all sections.  For example, get the statement of the problem being investigated from the Introduction; the participants and brief procedure from the Method, findings in the Results, conclusions in the Discussion, etc. of your paper.  It will probably be the last thing you write since it reviews the entire paper.  It is appropriate to give some statistical significance levels in the abstract.

 

(Introduction)

 

      This succeeds the abstract on a separate sheet of paper.  Do not use the word “Introduction” as a heading, but do type in the title of the article, capitalizing all major words.  The introduction should present the specific problem under study, a brief review of the most relevant studies done in the past (“relevant” usually means studies using similar independent and dependent variables), a relevant theoretical statement and a prediction (an hypothesis) of outcome based on the reviewed studies.  Do not include any information about your specific experiment in this section, until the last paragraph or two, where you will state the rationale for, and purpose of the present study.  Said another way, in the last paragraphs, and for our purposes, identify and define the variables you will manipulate, the measures that you will use (the dependent variables), and include a formal statement of your hypothesis.  The hypothesis should agree with the research and theory you have reviewed.

Method

 

This is the format for reporting a single experiment (see  pp. 27 and 317 for how to handle more than one experiment) . This section must be very detailed and clear to allow replication.  It consists of the following sections: Participants, Apparatus/Materials, Design/Procedure, (in PSYC 2010 we not use “Design.”

 

Participants (in italics)

     A statement of the number, age, gender, and where the participants were found (e.g. a Midwestern university General Psychology class) should be included here.  Also, include the selection procedure (randomly selected, haphazard, matched pairs, etc.).  When describing the number of subjects, use the numeric symbol (e.g. 3 males).  Spell out the number when it starts a sentence.

 

Apparatus/Materials (in italics)

     Describe any equipment used in the experiment.  This should include the name of the apparatus, manufacturer, model, number, approximate dimensions of the room, clocks, etc.  If there was no “apparatus,” just use the word “materials,” and vise versa.

 

Procedure (in italics)

     This section includes a detailed account of what you did (PSYC 2010 does not need a separate “design” section).  As completely as possible, and in step-by-step manner, the experimental procedure should be presented (e.g. the participant was asked to sit behind the table, etc.).  If you used some unusual measure, it can also be included here (e.g. how you derived the “total score” in the mirror tracing experiment).  Be sure not to discuss any actual results here.  Include information about how participants were assigned to the various groups and whether and how counterbalancing was employed.

 

Results

 

     This section is often confused with the discussion section.  Here, you describe what you found (descriptive and inferential statistics, graphs, called “figures,” tables, etc.).  Do not go into what it means - that belongs in the discussion - but guide the reader by indicating why you did the statistical test (e.g., “To determine if females had superior performance to males on reaction time, Group F was compared to Group M, etc..”). Be sure that your figures have an explanation or caption below the graph, preceded by “Figure 1” 9in italics).  Tables have an underlined caption above the table at the left margin.  Type “Table 1” a line above the caption, also on the left margin.

 

We customarily use “t” tests, and work at an alpha level of .05 to determine if the means are significantly different from one another (be sure to say, “An alpha level of .05 was used for all comparisons,” in your Results section). Where the computer gives the actual probability, if the probability is .05 or below, (like .02), there is a significant difference in means (also described as “rejecting the null hypothesis”). Summarize the statistics, offsetting it with comas, near the end of the sentence; for example, t (d.f.) = 2.68, p=.03.

 

Discussion

 

     Here you state what the results mean.  Do the results support the hypothesis, not support the hypothesis, or partially support the hypothesis?  Do the results agree with or disagree with the literature you reviewed in the Introduction?  Also, in case of unexpected results, a critique of the present experiment (or earlier experiments) may be in order.  A new theory may be suggested, but don’t overdo this.  Your primary responsibility is to evaluate and interpret your results and discuss implications. 

 

References

 

Organize this separate sheet of paper by arranging the books and papers alphabetically by the first author’s last name.  Also, indent 5 spaces (or whatever equals ½ inch) all lines of the reference, EXCEPT THE FIRST. Never rearrange the order of the authors’ names of a particular article or book.  Include only sources that you have actually held in your hand or read on the net. (Please see pages 219-232 of the APA Publication Manual for more examples). 

 

Book Example:

     Woodworth, R.S., & Schlosberg, H. (1954).  Experimental psychology.  New York: Holt,

                Rinehard & Winston.

 

Journal Example:

       Shapiro, S.C., Schuckman, H., Sussman, D., & Tucker, A.M. (1995).  Effects of telencephalic

                lesions on the gill cover response in Siamese fighting fish.  Psychology and Behavior, 13 (2), 749-755.

 

Edited volume example (includes encyclopedias that specify authored pieces) :

        Mitchell, K.M., Bogarth, J.D., & Kraught, C.C.  (1981).  A  reappraisal of the therapeutic effectiveness

                of accurate empathy; An experimental approach.  In A.S. Gurman, A.N. Razin, & B.O. Stinks (Eds.), Effective

                psychotherapy: A handbook research (pp. 239-252).  New York: Pergamon.

 

Citing an abstract as an original source:

      Jones, J.R., & Ewing, G.R. (1984).  Effects of hippocampus lesions on Lashley III maze performances.

                Psychological Abstracts, 70, 764.

 

Citing an abstract from a secondary source (e.g. PsycINFO):

      Nakazato, K., Shimano, A., & Homma, Y.  (1992).  Cognitive functions of centenarians: The Tokyo

                Metropolitan Centenarian Study.  Japanese Journal of Developmental Psychology, 3, 9-16.  Abstract obtained from

              PsycSCAN: Neuropsychology, 1993, 2, Abstract No. 604.

 

Electronic Media (on line): See pp 268-281 in the Publication Manual, (an example from print media follows:)

        Scott, G., Bray, B., & Subtle, V. (2002). Role-reversal in male and female interactions [Electronic version].  Journal of Social

               Interactions, 5, 111-122.   (That is, if you access a journal electronically that is also in print, use the above format.)

 

Electronic Media example of an article in an Internet-only journal:

        Busby, F.L. (2002, April 5).  Cultivating positive attitudes to enhance health.  Prevention & Treatment, 3,  Article 0001a.  Retrieved

                October 21,2001, from http://journals.apa.org/prevention/volume3/pre0030001a.html  (note, no period at end of a URL)

               

Appendix

 

For writing research reports (not PSYC 2000 summaries), you may be asked to include all raw data, statistical calculations,

survey results, etc. at the end of your paper.  Further, you may wish to have Appendix A” and “Appendix B” if the material is too unrelated to appear in only one appendix.                                                                                                              (2002 Version)